4 MIN READ

The Most Beautiful Words in the English Language, According to Linguists

They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder — or in this case, the linguist. Find out what some experts consider to be the most beautiful English words.

by Bennett Kleinman
Close-up of wooden letters

If you were to ask 100 different people to pick the most beautiful word in the English language, you’d probably get 100 different answers. There’s a seemingly endless list to choose from, as some words evoke pleasant memories, while others sound mellifluous to the ear. While there’s no way to reach a universal consensus, many esteemed linguists have favorites of their own. These are a few of them.

Ailurophile

Accomplished linguist Dr. Robert Beard compiled a list of what he personally considers to be the 100 most beautiful English words. Up first — at least alphabetically — is “ailurophile,” which appropriately sounds quite alluring. The word, which essentially means “cat lover,” is derived from the Greek ailuros, meaning “cat,” and phile, meaning “lover.” Its origins date back to the 1910s, though the word continues to make the hearts of linguists purr today. Not only does it sound pleasant, but it also evokes the beautiful connection that humans have with their beloved pets.

Advertisement
Tremulous

In 1995, wordsmith David Crystal unveiled a “matrix of criteria” that maps what makes certain words more beautiful than others. The word “tremulous” — meaning “shaking or quivering slightly” — fit every category. According to Crystal, beautiful words should contain three or more syllables, put a stress on the first syllable, and include an /m/ sound (as in “make”) and an /l/ sound (as in “all”). Six additional criteria relate to different manners of articulation and sounds made with different parts of the mouth, and “tremulous” hits every mark to a T, much to Crystal’s delight.

Murmuring

According to lifelong lexicographer Wilfred J. Funk, “murmuring” is one of the most beautiful English words. It’s defined as a soft, low sound, often spoken by a person or group, though the meaning isn’t the only reason it’s considered so beautiful. Rather, it’s the way the word is pronounced, with a double /m/ sound, as we touched on in the prior section. Three syllables and a wider variety of tones make “murmuring” more appealing than just “murmur.” According to Funk’s list, other beautiful words include “hush,” “lullaby,” and “luminous,” all of which sound pleasant and evoke positive feelings.

Advertisement
Nefarious

Lucy Bella Simkins, a popular British YouTuber with over 12 million subscribers,  created a video of 15 of the most beautiful English words. “Nefarious” — a word with a less beautiful meaning of “wicked or criminal” — made her list. Despite the criminal connotation, Simkins maintains the word is delightful to say and hear due to its expressiveness. She also praises the /eə/ sound in the middle, which adds to its euphonic appeal.

Mother

The British Council — a U.K. organization for cultural relations — conducted a 2004 survey among 40,000 non-English speakers to find the most beautiful word in English. The result was “mother,” beating out runners-up “passion” and “smile.” Chris Wade, the organization’s director of communications, noted, “All of us have a mother and have a reasonable idea of who that person is. It’s one piece of certainty we can have and it’s a very powerful word in a variety of cultures.” The word clearly evokes comfort in many cultures around the world, adding to its beauty.

Advertisement
Radiance

In 1911, the Public Speaking Club of America offered a prize to challenge people to come up with the most beautiful English words, based on sound and meaning. New York lawyer James Shea submitted 21 words that were accepted, one of which was “radiance,” meaning “light or heat as emitted or reflected by something.” Both the sound and meaning of the word earned it a spot on the list, alongside “happiness” and “splendor.” “Grace” and “justice,” however, were disqualified for the harsh sounds made by the first letters.

Cellar Door

We’d be remiss if we left off what some consider to be the most beautiful pairing of words in the English language: “cellar door.” Many have praised this combo for its euphonious sound. Journalist H. L. Mencken called it “intrinsically musical, in clang-tint and rhythm,” while Lord of the Rings author J.R.R. Tolkien was a noted fan of its beauty. In 1963, author C. S. Lewis admitted his astonishment when he saw the phrase written as “Selladore,” which he found an “enchanting proper name.”

Featured image credit: A. C./ Unsplash+
Bennett Kleinman
Staff Writer
Bennett Kleinman is a New York City-based staff writer for Optimism. He is also a freelance comedy writer, devoted New York Yankees and New Jersey Devils fan, and thinks plain seltzer is the best drink ever invented.
Advertisement
2 MIN READ

What Are Gerunds?

When is a verb not a verb? When it’s a gerund — an “-ing” verb acting like a noun. “Gerunds” might be a new word for you, but you use them every day.

by Rachel Gresh
High angle view of man reading a book while relaxing in bed

Picture this: It’s Friday night and your plans include eating pizza while binge-watching Netflix (same!). Not only are these stellar plans, but you’ve also used not one but two gerund phrases. A gerund will always end in “-ing,” but it must fit some other requirements. It’s based on a verb, so it expresses an action or a state of being, but it functions as a noun. From grade school, we know that nouns are people, places, things, or ideas, but in grammar, they perform specific functions. In a sentence, they might be a subject, direct object, subject complement, or object of preposition. So if you spot an “-ing” verb that looks like it’s performing one of those jobs, it’s a gerund. In the above example, “eating” and “binge-watching” are subject complements of “plans.” Let’s look at some of the most common usages of gerunds. 

Advertisement

Many times, gerunds are the subject of the sentence, as in, “Running is a healthy hobby.” While “running” is traditionally a verb, in this case, it’s moonlighting as a noun. (The verb “is” works as a linking verb.) Gerund phrases are formed when a gerund has modifiers or objects related to it. For example, “Reading books is the best way to spend a rainy day” features the gerund phrase “reading books.” Here, the gerund is “reading” (a verb acting as a noun), the object of the gerund is “books,” and the verb is “is.”

Gerunds are also commonly found as the direct object of a verb (the thing being acted upon). Consider the sentence, “I enjoy baking cookies.” Here, “enjoy” is the verb, and “baking” is a gerund — it acts as a noun and is the direct object of “baking.” So, “baking cookies” is a gerund phrase. 

But wait — why is it called a “gerund”? This word comes from the Latin gerundum, meaning “to be carried out.” In English, it’s used to refer to those shapeshifting “-ing” verbs that act as nouns, marking thousands of years of grammar evolution. 

Featured image credit: skynesher/ iStock
Rachel Gresh
Freelance Writer
Rachel is a Washington, D.C.-based freelance writer. When she's not writing, you can find her wandering through a museum, exploring a new city, or advocating the importance of the Oxford comma.
Advertisement
2 MIN READ

What’s the Difference Between “Anyway” and “Any Way”?

These homonyms have drastically different uses: one as an adverb and the other as a noun phrase. You might think you know the difference, but let’s have a grammar review anyway.

by Rachel Gresh
American rock group Journey, New York, 1978

As the legendary rock band Journey tells us: “Any way you want it / That’s the way you need it.” Journey wasn’t just delivering their first big hit of the ’80s with these lyrics — they were also (unintentionally) giving us a grammar lesson about the commonly confused homonyms “any way” and “anyway.” Only one of these words is suitable for the title of the rock anthem “Any Way You Want It.”

First, let’s look at “any way,” the term used in the song you might have heard at a karaoke bar or in the background of your favorite movie or TV show. “Any way” means “in any matter” or “by any means.” In this case, “any” is an adverb meaning “at all; in some degree (used for emphasis),” and “way” is a noun meaning “a method, style, or manner of doing something.” Consider the song lyrics — they’re all about flexibility and freedom. In another context, you might say, “I wanted to help in any way I could,” suggesting that you would help however possible. 

Its counterpart, “anyway,” is used quite differently. “Anyway” is an adverb that most often means “regardless” or “in any case,” as in, “I’m not feeling very social, but I’ll go to the party anyway.” In a casual sense, it can help us change topics as a transition word or bridge that shifts the focus to something else: “Anyway, let’s talk about something more upbeat.” Keeping this in mind, a swap of Journey’s lyrics to include “anyway” instead of “any way” wouldn’t make sense at all.

Now, you might be thinking: “What about ‘anyways‘?” This word is actually an informal substitute for “anyway.” According to Merriam-Webster, it means the same thing as “anyway” but should be reserved for casual conversation and not formal writing. Adding to the confusion, in British English, “anyways” is used in formal situations, so it’s not uncommon to mix this up. The next time you’re typing up an email or shouting out song lyrics, remember that these homonyms (and their companion, “anyways”) might sound the same, but they produce different meanings, any way you slice it. 

Featured image credit: Michael Putland/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images
Rachel Gresh
Freelance Writer
Rachel is a Washington, D.C.-based freelance writer. When she's not writing, you can find her wandering through a museum, exploring a new city, or advocating the importance of the Oxford comma.
Advertisement
3 MIN READ

Why Are There So Many Folk Songs About Maypoles?

You’ve probably heard of April fools and june bugs, but what about maypoles? And why do they feature so prominently in folk songs? It’s time to stop dancing around the question — let’s get to answering it.

by Bennett Kleinman
Maypole & Flowers

Scandinavia, Germanic Europe, and the British Isles have centuries-old festivals of dancing and folk songs with charming lyrics to celebrate spring or early summertime. Dancing around the maypole — a tall, thin, wooden pole, often adorned with floral garlands, other greenery, and colorful ribbons — is a tradition that began in pagan festivals, but it came to America with early settlers. The maypole features prominently in folk song lyrics across many cultures, celebrating the joys of the warmer seasons. 

Maypoles have long been an essential part of the May Day (traditionally May 1) celebrations for which they’re named. This European folk festival, with roots in the ancient Roman festival Floralia, celebrates the transition from spring to summer. (“May Day” can also refer to International Workers’ Day, which celebrates workers’ rights around the world on May 1.) But despite their May-centric name, maypoles are also part of the Midsommar celebrations in Scandinavia, which honor the summer solstice in June. The poles were incorporated into Midsommar festivities by the 1500s — they’re called midsommarstång in Sweden, with stång being Swedish for “pole.”

Advertisement

May Day dancing is often accompanied by folk songs with simple lyrics that are easy to memorize and don’t distract from the dancing. Unlike the comparatively serious church music of the 16th and 17th centuries, these lighthearted ditties were written to evoke feelings of positivity, celebration, innocence, and fun.

Take, for instance, the 17th-century song “Come Lasses and Lads,” still sung around maypoles today: 

“Come lasses and lads, get leave of your dads 
And away to the maypole hie
For every fair has a sweetheart there 
And the fiddler’s standing by.”

“Here We Go ’Round the Maypole High” — sung to the tune of “Here We Go ’Round the Mulberry Bush” — follows an even simpler repetitive pattern: “Here we go ’round the Maypole high, the Maypole high, the Maypole high, here we go ’round the Maypole high, let colored ribbons fly, let colored ribbons fly.” These words seem to be written to capture the joy of spring, not to impress audiences with lyrical complexity.

Maypoles — and in turn, the related folk songs — came to the U.S. with English settlers in the early 17th century. In 1627, Merrimount settler Thomas Morton staged an inadvertently scandalous maypole celebration that left Puritan settlers aghast. They were taken aback by lyrics such as “Uncover thy head, and fear no harm, For here’s good liquor to keep it warm.” This tale was retold in 1836 by author Nathaniel Hawthorne in a short story titled “The May-Pole of Merry Mount.”

This May 1, will you be dancing around the maypole and singing folk songs? There are plenty to choose from

Featured image credit: Matt Baca/Wirestock Creators/ AdobeStock
Bennett Kleinman
Staff Writer
Bennett Kleinman is a New York City-based staff writer for Optimism. He is also a freelance comedy writer, devoted New York Yankees and New Jersey Devils fan, and thinks plain seltzer is the best drink ever invented.
Advertisement
3 MIN READ

When Should I Use “i.e.” vs. “e.g.”?

Knowing when to use “i.e.” vs. “e.g.” is as easy as 1, 2, 3 — especially if you follow a helpful mnemonic device that can guide you.

by Bennett Kleinman
Wooden blocks with "FOR EXAMPLE" text

The abbreviations “i.e.” and “e.g.” come from Latin, but they remain widely used in the English language. Despite their prevalence, a lot of folks don’t know how to use them correctly or use them interchangeably. In truth, “i.e.” and “e.g.” have their own unique meanings. Thankfully, it’s easy to tell them apart so long as you know a little about their etymological roots.

The abbreviation “i.e.” comes from the Latin id est, meaning “in other words.” The abbreviation “e.g.,” on the other hand, stands for the Latin exempli gratia, which roughly translates to “for instance.” In practice, you should use “i.e.” when attempting to add a bit of clarification, whereas “e.g.” is better suited for listing out examples. As a helpful mnemonic device, think of the “i” in “i.e.” as the start of “in other words,” and the “e” in “e.g.” as “example.”

Advertisement

Here’s a hypothetical situation: You’re texting someone about an upcoming trip to Europe, and want to give them some details. Either of these texts would be grammatically acceptable:

I plan to visit many European countries, i.e., I have a very full itinerary.

I plan to visit many European countries, e.g., Portugal, Spain, and France.

In the first sentence, the phrase following “i.e.” reiterates the message of the preceding phrase. It could also be read as, “I plan to visit many European countries; in other words, I have a very full itinerary.” Subbing in “for example” doesn’t work as well — “I plan to visit many European countries; for example, I have a very full itinerary” — so we know “i.e.” is the correct abbreviation. In the second sentence, however, “for example” makes more sense before the list of countries than “in other words,” so we know “e.g.” is correct. Also note that a comma always follows both of the abbreviations and their requisite periods in the sentences. 

This should clear up how to differentiate between “i.e.” and “e.g.” — but you may still be wondering why you should use “e.g.” instead of “ex.” (an abbreviation of the word “example”). The main reason is that “ex.” can also be a shortened version of other words such as “executive” or “exact,” and it may not always mean “example.” But “e.g.” always means exempli gratia — the Latin avoids any confusion. 

Featured image credit: Seiya Tabuchi/ iStock
Bennett Kleinman
Staff Writer
Bennett Kleinman is a New York City-based staff writer for Optimism. He is also a freelance comedy writer, devoted New York Yankees and New Jersey Devils fan, and thinks plain seltzer is the best drink ever invented.
Advertisement
3 MIN READ

Why Do We Call Them “Jeans”?

Blue jeans are an iconic symbol of American fashion and a workwear staple for blue-collar professionals such as miners and ranch hands. But the term “jeans” has European origins dating to the 15th century.

by Bennett Kleinman
Blue jeans in a clothing store

Italy and France have long been at the forefront of fashion, lending materials and ideas to designers around the world. It makes sense, then, that these countries also have influenced fashion lingo in many languages. One particular example is the word “jeans,” which, despite its thoroughly American reputation, comes from a French term having to do with fabrics produced in an Italian city.

Your favorite pair of blue jeans can be traced back to the French jean fustian — a term that can be broken down into two parts. Jean refers to the Italian city of Genoa, which was known in the 15th century for producing a popular type of twilled cloth that the French referred to as fustian. So in essence, jean fustian is what the French called a sturdy cotton cloth made in Genoa, Italy. 

Advertisement

The singular “jean” first entered English around the mid-15th century, though it referred to the cloth, not a specific type of garment, such as pants. However, given its sturdy nature, jean was widely used to make workwear, which included durable pairs of pants. The plural “jeans” came about thanks to English-speaking sailors. When sailors arrived at the port city of Genoa, they were introduced to this sturdy, attractive workwear that was often dyed blue with indigo, as was popular at the time. Eventually, the term for this Genoese workwear became anglicized as “jeans.”

The modern version of jeans became popular around the mid-19th century, in large part due to Levi Strauss. Originally, these pants were officially known as “waist overalls” — Levi Strauss & Co. notes it wasn’t until the 1960s that the colloquialism “jeans” had a resurgence and became the norm. However, while the term was borrowed from jean fustian, the earliest Levis were primarily made of denim — a sturdy fabric akin to the Genoan fabric, but not exactly the same. In fact, the word “denim” has different European roots. It’s derived from the French serge de Nîmes, which referred to a sturdy woven fabric originally manufactured in Nîmes, France. By the 1860s, de Nîmes (“from Nîmes”) was also anglicized as “denim.”

Eventually, the word “jeans” superseded all other terms as a colloquialism for sturdy workwear — often blue — that has some vague connection to the Genoese sailor outfits from all those centuries ago. While it may not be entirely historically accurate to call pants made of denim “jeans” — given they usually have no direct connection to Genoa — it’s the sartorial norm.

Featured image credit: gmalandra/ iStock
Bennett Kleinman
Staff Writer
Bennett Kleinman is a New York City-based staff writer for Optimism. He is also a freelance comedy writer, devoted New York Yankees and New Jersey Devils fan, and thinks plain seltzer is the best drink ever invented.
Advertisement
3 MIN READ

When Did We Start “Breaking the Ice”?

The bold act of “breaking the ice” is common practice in modern social settings, but the expression stems from centuries-old maritime tradition.

by Rachel Gresh
A woman introducing herself to colleagues

An idiom, by definition, is a phrase in which the overall meaning is understood separately from the individual meanings of the words. Some idioms are so ingrained in our collective vocabulary that we never think about what the true meanings are. Consider the idiom “break the ice.” This expression — meaning “to say or do something to relieve tension” — might seem like a modern invention designed for cocktail parties or business meetings, but it actually has roots in the Italian Renaissance.

For the origin of this well-loved idiom, we look to Desiderius Erasmus, a 15th-century Dutch theologian. Erasmus recorded a collection of over 4,000 annotated Greek and Latin proverbs (idioms) in his book Adagia. “Break the ice” is among these expressions, recorded in the first installment of the book as proverb No. 374. Erasmus credits this saying to an Italian humanist by the name of Francesco Filelfo. In his own words, Erasmus states that the expression “break the ice” means “to open the way and to be the first in beginning a task.” He says it is “derived from boatmen who send one of their number ahead to break up the ice on a frozen river and open the way for others.” In a modern twist, ships specifically designed for breaking up channel ice are dubbed “icebreakers.” 

Advertisement

William Barker — a 20th-century editor who compiled the work of Erasmus in The Adages of Erasmus — believes that Erasmus was citing Filelfo’s Epistolae, letters addressed to the leading humanists and lords of Italy. They exemplify the political and literary goings-on of the Italian Renaissance. Today, one volume of these letters is preserved in the renowned Uffizi Library in Florence, Italy. The specific expression that Filelfo uses in the letters is glaciem fregi, meaning “I have broken the ice.” Barker also notes that unlike nearly all of the other proverbs listed by Erasmus, “break the ice” is not found in any classical Latin literature in the figurative sense — adding an air of mystery to the origin of the expression. 

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, when the expression first emerged in English, it was used to reference the beginning of an undertaking, especially faced with difficulty or resistance, akin to the difficulty of literally breaking through ice in water. Oxford’s first citation of the phrase is from the mid-16th-century divorce papers for Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon: “This reuerend father..chaunced..to be one of the first that brake the yse, and [showed]..the inconvenience that followed.” 

By the late 18th century, the expression had evolved slightly to mean  “to do or say something to relieve tension or get conversation going” — the same manner in which we often use it today. We can see this usage in a 1795 collection of poems by Samuel Jackson Pratt, titled Gleanings through Wales, Holland and Westphalia: “Notwithstanding..,there is an air of distance, reserve, and even coldness, they are all.., replete with an anxious desire to break the ice.” While business meetings and orientation halls are less fanciful circumstances, the idiom’s meaning still stands, two centuries later.

Featured image credit: Dimensions/ iStock
Rachel Gresh
Freelance Writer
Rachel is a Washington, D.C.-based freelance writer. When she's not writing, you can find her wandering through a museum, exploring a new city, or advocating the importance of the Oxford comma.
Advertisement
3 MIN READ

What Is the Weirdest Sentence in English?

The sentence “Colorless green ideas sleep furiously” might be a befitting addition to a Dr. Seuss rhyme, but it was created by famed linguist Noam Chomsky to illustrate an important grammatical theory.

by Rachel Gresh
Noam Chomsky poses while in his office at M.I.T. University

Noam Chomsky, “the father of modern linguistics,” revolutionized language with topics such as generative grammar and the concept of universal grammar. But I’m fascinated by one nonsensical statement invented by Chomsky, which might be the weirdest sentence in English: “Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.” It’s correct from a strictly grammatical standpoint, but something about it is off. This sentence, aptly known as the “Chomsky sentence,” was an example used by the famed linguist to illustrate the idea that a sentence can be grammatically correct yet meaningless. He aimed to convey that syntax (sentence structure) is independent of semantics (meaning). 

Advertisement

The statement was featured in Chomsky’s 1957 book Syntactic Structures, and it appears to obey all the conventional rules of English grammar. It opens with a noun phrase (“colorless green ideas”) featuring two adjectives (“colorless” and “green”) that describe a noun (“ideas”). Next, the verb phrase, “sleep furiously,” brings action to the sentence, with the adverb “furiously” modifying the verb “sleep.” These are all permissible grammar choices, but that doesn’t mean the words in the sentence make sense together. This paradox is precisely the point: Chomsky concluded that grammar is autonomous and independent of meaning.

Though Chomsky believed this sentence was illogical, others have worked to defend its semantics. David Policar of MIT argued that the sentence does make sense. In his humorous and long-winded defense, he explained that we’re simply looking at the words wrong. “Green,” for example, should be interpreted as “inexperienced,” meaning that it’s a new idea — not a colorful one. In this sense, “colorless” is an appropriate adjective because ideas are mere concepts that lack color.

Similarly, Policar argued that “sleep” can be a proper action for an idea if it means the idea is at rest or simply not thought of yet. He also argued that “sleeping furiously” is possible, just as “writing furiously” can mean writing intensely. According to Policar, the Chomsky sentence could be transcribed as, “New ideas (that lack color) are intensely resting, waiting to be discovered.” We don’t know if Chomsky ever came across Policar’s eccentric examination of the sentence, but we’re sure he would be amused by it. 

What does the Chomsky sentence mean for an amateur linguist such as myself? It’s just another quirk of language that lets me know there’s always more to learn. 

Featured image credit: Ulf Andersen/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images
Rachel Gresh
Freelance Writer
Rachel is a Washington, D.C.-based freelance writer. When she's not writing, you can find her wandering through a museum, exploring a new city, or advocating the importance of the Oxford comma.
Advertisement
2 MIN READ

Why Should You Never Use “Alot”?

Do you know the difference between “a lot,” “allot,” and “alot”? One means “a large amount,” the other means “to distribute,” and one is not a word at all.

by Samantha Abernethy
Alot, a lot, and allot written on street sign

“A lot,” “allot,” “alot” — these terms may look alike and sound alike, but it’s time to settle any questions about this trio once and for all.

Let’s start by eliminating one: “Alot”  is not a word. It’s just a common misspelling. You’ve probably seen “alot” enough times that it feels right, but just because we see it a lot doesn’t make it correct. Writing “alot” instead of “a lot” would be akin to writing “alittle” instead of “a little.”

“A lot” means “a large amount,” and the term can function as either a quantifier/indefinite pronoun or an adverb. For example, in the case of “She has a lot of meetings today,” “a lot” is an indefinite pronoun modifying “meetings.” If you were to say, “He talks a lot,” “a lot” is an adverb modifying “talks.”

While common in everyday English, “a lot” is informal and should be avoided in formal writing. In professional writing, consider more polished substitutions. For adverbs, try “often,” “frequently,” or “greatly.” If you need a quantifier or indefinite pronoun, use “much,” “many,” or “plenty,” depending on the context. 

“Allot” is a verb meaning “to distribute or to assign,” often appearing when something is split into smaller shares. You might say, “She allots 20 minutes for each meeting,” or “He allotted adequate resources to each person.” 

“Lot” on its own has additional meanings: a tract of land, a place to park, a person’s fate, or a portion of a whole. While perhaps not the best writing, this sentence is grammatically correct: “His lot in life was to allot lots to a lot of people.” 

So remember: Use “a lot” for quantity, use “allot” for assigning, and avoid “alot” … a lot.  

Featured image credit: Karen Roach/ Adobe Stock
Samantha Abernethy
Freelance Writer
Samantha Abernethy is a freelancer in Chicago. When she isn't staring at a laptop, you can find her sniffing out the best coffee with her greyhound Ruby, or chasing her kids around the nearest library.
Advertisement
5 MIN READ

19 Most Commonly Confused Terms in English Grammar

Get a grip on tricky word pairs with this guide to English grammar’s most commonly confused terms, complete with practical tips and memorable tricks to help you choose the right word every time.

by Jennifer A. Freeman
Letters of the English alphabet in hands with pen

Imagine you’re drafting an important email to your boss when you pause to debate whether to write “affect” or “effect,” or “ensure” or “insure.” Even seasoned writers encounter these common word-choice challenges. Whether you’re a student, professional, or casual writer, mastering these frequently confused terms can elevate your writing from good to great. Let’s take a quick look at tricky word pairs (or trios) and learn some practical tips to help you choose the right term every time.

Affect vs. Effect

Of all the words on this list, these two may be the hardest to keep straight. “Affect” is usually used as a verb meaning “to have an effect on.” (The adorable puppy affected her mood.) “Effect” is most often used as a noun that means “a change produced by a cause.” (The effect was that she smiled for the rest of the day.) Need a tip to help you remember the difference between the similar words? Swap out the word in question with “alter” and “result.” If “alter” (meaning “to change character or composition”) fits the sentence, then “affect” is the correct word. If “result” (meaning “a consequence or outcome”) is a better substitution, then “effect” is the right term. Consider the example sentences used earlier:

The adorable puppy altered her mood. The result was that she smiled for the rest of the visit.
The adorable puppy resulted her mood. The alter was that she smiled for the rest of the visit.

The first version is correct, so we know “affect” belongs in the first sentence and “effect” in the latter. 

Of course, “affect” can also be used as a noun, but that’s limited to psychological contexts (such as a “depressed affect”), and “effect” can be a verb meaning “to bring about change.” These constructions are less commonly used than the examples given above.  

Counsel vs. Council

These words are homophones — they sound alike but are spelled differently. The verb “counsel” means “to advise someone,” but it can also be used as a noun in similar contexts. (A lawyer offers her clients legal counsel.) On the other hand, a council is a group that gives advice. Think of a city council gathering to vote on installing a new traffic light at a busy intersection.

Everyday vs. Every Day

Trying to decide between these two terms can be tricky, but once you understand the difference, it’s a piece of cake. “Everyday” is an adjective that means “ordinary” or “commonplace.” (Her mother wore her everyday dress to the market.) Separate this term into two words when you want to use it to mean “daily.” (She rode the bus to work every day.) If “single” can be inserted between “every” and “day” to clarify, then “every day” is the correct term. (She rode the bus to work every single day.)

Insure vs. Ensure

This word pair may cause you to check on your current insurance coverage. To insure an item means it is secured or protected, usually financially. (Jana insured her heirloom jewelry in case of theft.) On the other hand, “ensure” means “to make certain a problem doesn’t happen.” (Jana wanted to ensure her jewelry wouldn’t be stolen, so she kept it in a lock box.)

Led vs. Lead

These homophones sound alike but have different meanings and spellings. Both words rhyme with “bed,” but “lead” is a type of metal and “led” is the past tense of the verb “lead” (which is spelled the same as the metal, but rhymes with “heed”). To explain how Angelica showed Sari the way to math class, we could say that she led the other girl through the halls. But if Sari shared her pencil with Angelica, we would call it a lead pencil. 

Lose vs. Loose

So many people get tripped up by an extra “O.” These words sound similar, yet their meanings are very different. When you lose, it means you’ve failed to win at a game or other contest. Or maybe you just can’t find something. (I lose my keys every time I walk in this house.) When describing something that is not firmly or tightly fixed, “loose” is the correct word. (He had a loose grip on the leash.) There’s also a subtle difference in pronunciation: “Lose” is pronounced with an “ooz” sound, and “loose” has an “oos” sound.

Than vs. Then

Use “than” to compare ideas or elements. (The yacht is bigger than the boat.) The word “then” is useful to discuss time or sequence. (The boat docked, then the yacht entered the harbor.)

There vs. Their vs. They’re

This trio of homophones is notorious for causing confusion. “There” is all about place and location. (Her cousins walked from over there.) “Their” is a possessive pronoun indicating something belongs to a group of people. (Her cousins brought their doll collection.) Finally, “they’re” is a contraction of the words “they are.” (They’re going to play with the dolls.)

Who vs. Which

The most straightforward rule to remember is that “who” always refers to people, and “which” always refers to things. For example, in the sentence, “I know a doctor who can treat your cold,” the word “who” refers to the doctor. In another example, “Margo showed us her coat, which she bought last week,” “which” describes an object, the coat.

Featured image credit: Natalia POGODINA/ iStock
Jennifer A. Freeman
Senior Editor, Word Smarts
Jennifer A. Freeman is the Senior Editor of Word Smarts and Word Daily. When she's not searching for a perfect synonym or reaching "Genius" level on Spelling Bee, she's playing with her Welsh Terrier in Greenville, SC.
Advertisement